Not one of these people has in any way refuted the very well-sourced and nonpartisan reporting of Politico.

First of all, that’s not true:

Second of all — because I doubt that you would believe those rebuttals anyway, which, okay, fine—I would ask how you reached the conclusion that that single Politico article is “well-sourced and non-partisan.” The Politico article literally says, “There’s little evidence of such a top-down effort by Ukraine.” The people quoted directly in the article have refuted its framing, and neither of the authors has a reputation for non-partisan work. One of them is even responsible in part for the whole Hunter Biden suspicion, even while—again!—acknowledging that “No evidence has surfaced that the former vice president intentionally tried to help his son by pressing for the prosecutor general’s dismissal.” The guy literally published two pieces about this Ukraine conspiracy that explicitly acknowledge a lack of evidence. Does that really sound well-sourced to you?

Written by

Writer of fiction, article, songs, and more. Enjoys quantum physics, Oxford Commas, & romantic clichés, esp. when they involve whiskey. HATES Journey.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store